Danny Boyle’s latest installment in the zombie genre, 28 Years Later, attempts to delve into profound philosophical questions within its apocalyptic setting but ultimately falls short. Released with an R rating, this theatrical film follows a 2002 precedent set by Boyle’s groundbreaking 28 Days Later, which revived the zombie genre through its innovative elements like rapid zombies and stories of survival against dystopian backdrops. The sequel, 28 Weeks Later, continued that legacy, but 28 Years Later aims higher, seeking to blend action with deeper moral inquiries.
Set 28 years post the outbreak of the Rage virus, Great Britain remains quarantined, depicting a world that has somewhat advanced while encompassing areas still rife with humanity’s struggles. The narrative centers on Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and his son Spike (Alfie Williams), who embark on a dangerous journey in search of a doctor that may help Jamie’s mentally ill wife, Isla (Jodie Comer). The film effectively captures Boyle’s signature style with its fast-paced editing, skewed angles, and vibrant soundtracks, creating an immersive experience filled with tension.
However, the film’s philosophical ambitions prove convoluted. As Spike confronts the undead, he battles moral dilemmas about what it means to be human. A chilling scene reveals the doctor’s nihilistic view toward life, as he has devised a grim collection of remains, culminating in a disconcerting suggestion of euthanasia for Isla. Such moments are jarring and seem to contradict the initial themes of survival and the worth of life that the film establishes in its earlier acts.
Despite the disappointment in fulfilling its thematic promise, the film sparks reflections on life, death, and societal values, especially given the context of contemporary discussions around euthanasia, particularly in the UK. Rather than simply portraying a horrific world devoid of hope, it serves as a mirror to complex social issues.
While Boyle’s film may not capture the heroism it aspires to showcase, it does remind audiences of the importance of valuing life amid dire circumstances. Figures of inspiration, such as saints like Damian Molokai and Anna Schäffer, exemplify the virtues of love for life, offering a contrast to the bleak themes explored in 28 Years Later. The film, although flawed, still presents an opportunity for reflection on our morality and the choices we face in a world that can often seem devoid of hope.