One hundred and sixty-seven clan leaders across the 22 districts in Tailevu have yet to receive their quarterly allowance, an issue brought to light by Provincial Council Chair Semi Matalau during the recent 2025 Tailevu Provincial Council meeting. The matter was also discussed at a recent Lau Provincial Council meeting, emphasizing the ongoing concerns regarding traditional leadership compensation.
Despite some council members expressing apprehension about the acceptance of government allowances possibly undermining the traditional nature of their roles, Matalau asserted that this initiative should not be viewed through a political lens. He clarified that the allowance, which was introduced by the government, was not initiated by traditional leaders but was designed to compensate them for their significant contributions to their communities.
Matalau acknowledged that there are broader inquiries regarding the integrity of traditional leaders receiving allowances. He stressed that the rising cost of living necessitated this compensation, especially considering the responsibilities they bear, which often include substantial transportation costs and other duties pertinent to their districts. “Being a farmer in rural communities while fulfilling traditional responsibilities is not easy,” he noted.
The allowance, amounting to $100 per month, was introduced in the 2023-2024 financial year as part of the Vanua Leadership Allowance program, which aims to benefit more than 600 clan leaders. It is expected to commence in the current financial year. Matalau urged the government to urgently address this matter, not only for Tailevu but also for the rest of the provinces in Fiji.
Meanwhile, a representative from the Ministry of iTaukei Affairs has reiterated that efforts are ongoing to resolve this issue, indicating a commitment to supporting traditional leadership in Fiji.
This situation highlights the larger context of traditional leadership within the region, where previously, discussions have surfaced regarding the importance of recognizing and filling vacant traditional titles to strengthen community governance. The ongoing efforts to formalize and adequately support these leadership roles are crucial for enhancing local governance and community development.
As Tailevu navigates these challenges, there remains hope that collaborative efforts between traditional leaders and government authorities will pave the way for improved recognition and support, thereby fostering stronger community governance and unity.
