Concerns about the deteriorating infrastructure in Suva have sparked renewed discussions among business leaders and local officials regarding the need for clearer accountability in overseeing the capital city’s facilities. Many stakeholders have expressed frustration over the persistent flaws and overlapping responsibilities among various government agencies responsible for infrastructure maintenance.
Issues such as uneven footpaths, crooked walkways, and ongoing sewage problems have drawn sharp criticism from both retailers and residents. These deteriorating conditions are perceived as detrimental to public safety and business operations within the city.
Jitesh Patel, President of the Suva Retailers Association, articulated his disappointment with the Fiji Roads Authority, emphasizing a lack of visible action. “We haven’t seen anything done by the Fiji Roads Authority. Any action taken by anybody would be welcomed. This has been on paper for a while now, for the Council to take over, but no action has been taken. That’s why we’re really frustrated,” Patel stated.
Infrastructure management in Suva currently involves multiple agencies, including the Fiji Roads Authority and the Water Authority of Fiji. When issues surface, the Suva City Council often defers to these organizations, which critics argue leads to confusion, delays, and a lack of accountability.
Tevita Boseiwaqa, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Suva City Council, acknowledged the complexities arising from having two to three agencies managing distinct aspects of the city’s infrastructure. He suggested that consolidating responsibility could streamline decision-making and expedite improvements to roads and essential services.
Retailers are eager to see meaningful advancements, regardless of which agency holds authority. Patel underscored the pressing need for action, pointing out that businesses have been waiting for years for discussions to yield substantial outcomes.
Minister for Local Government Maciu Nalumisa confirmed that efforts are underway to transfer ownership of infrastructure back to municipal councils. He remarked, “Now we are refining our MOA with those two institutions, and also we’ll come back to cabinet to assist that in that particular area. Hopefully, before we can have the Municipal Elections, these services will be reverted to the municipal councils.”
As officials make strides toward a more unified management approach for Suva’s infrastructure, there is a sense of optimism regarding potential improvements that could enhance both business activity and public safety throughout the city. This collaborative effort highlights the importance of accountability and clear lines of responsibility in revitalizing urban infrastructure, ultimately leading to a more sustainable and prosperous Suva.