What If Jamie Foxx Had Been the Fast X Villain?

What If Jamie Foxx Had Been the Fast X Villain?

Recent reports indicate that the creators of the Fast and Furious franchise once considered casting Jamie Foxx as the primary antagonist in Fast X. This intriguing possibility emerged from a book by Barry Hertz, a well-respected film critic. In his book, Hertz shares that the writing team had initially crafted a post-credits scene for the 2021 film F9, with aspirations of bringing Foxx into the next installment.

The writers of Fast X explored various potential villains and even developed eight different post-credits scenarios before deciding on the scene that ultimately introduced Jason Momoa as Dante Reyes. This illustrates the dynamic nature of the casting process in blockbuster filmmaking.

Jamie Foxx, known for his remarkable versatility demonstrated in films like “Django Unchained” and “The Amazing Spider-Man” series, would have brought a unique flavor to the role of the main villain. With an Oscar to his name for his portrayal in “Ray,” Foxx’s background and age could have delivered a distinctive character that differed significantly from Momoa’s portrayal of Dante, who is the son of Hernan Reyes, the antagonist from Fast Five. Foxx likely would have portrayed a new character, potentially a rival crime boss or corrupt executive, which could have shifted the narrative tone and introduced fresh conflict.

While Hertz provides captivating insights, his book does not confirm any formal discussions took place with Foxx, nor does it detail what character he might have portrayed. The absence of definitive proof positions this storyline more as an enticing rumor rather than a confirmed fact.

Fans remain curious about how the series might have unfolded with Foxx. Would the climactic chase have changed? How would audiences have reacted to a different adversary? These lingering questions foster ongoing speculation and discussion.

Had Jamie Foxx replaced Jason Momoa, the film’s plot could have traversed themes of corporate treachery or personal vendettas related to Vin Diesel’s character, thus transforming the emotional stakes of the narrative.

Ultimately, while the Fast X team opted for Jason Momoa, leading to the film’s success at the box office, the possibility of Jamie Foxx as the villain introduces a fascinating dimension to the franchise’s legacy. It serves as a reminder of the myriad “what-if” scenarios that often accompany the creation of major cinematic projects, highlighting the exhaustive creative processes behind blockbuster films.

Popular Categories


Search the website