Environmental advocates have recognized Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as a proponent of climate initiatives. However, some critics have expressed concerns regarding his record on mining practices. They argue that his administration has not sufficiently addressed mining developments, particularly near sensitive watersheds that conservationists and local tribes believe must be safeguarded.
During a recent rally in Michigan, Walz emphasized his commitment to conservation, stating it is a shared value among Great Lakes states. He noted, “We in the upper Midwest, in our states, care for 20 percent of the world’s fresh water in those Great Lakes.”
In the delicate balance between environmental protection and economic growth, particularly regarding mining for critical minerals like copper and nickel, Walz has navigated a complex landscape. This is especially true given Minnesota’s vast untapped deposits of such minerals, which are crucial for clean energy technologies.
Chris Knopf, executive director of Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness, acknowledged Walz’s efforts in clean energy and electric vehicle promotion but pointed out that he has not engaged in more significant debates surrounding sulfide mining. Critics worry that proposed mines in northern Minnesota might release harmful pollutants into vital wetlands and rivers, potentially impacting ecosystems that feed into Lake Superior and the Boundary Waters. Conversely, mining companies argue that state studies indicate viable methods for minimizing environmental impact during operations.
Knopf remarked, “On many issues, he’s been very strong for the environment, but on this one, he’s been on the sidelines.” He suggested that Walz is strategically avoiding confrontation to maintain political alliances.
In Minnesota’s Iron Range, where mining has a storied presence, Walz has garnered support from a diverse coalition, including miners, labor unions, and environmental organizations. This unity persists as mining shifts focus to metals critical for electric vehicles and other technologies.
Emil Ramirez, international vice president of the United Steelworkers, noted that Walz reassured workers at a recent union mining conference about the state’s potential for sustainable mining. He expressed confidence that the state could expand mining responsibly while streamlining the permitting process.
While both Walz’s office and the Harris campaign did not provide comments, Walz has consistently expressed his commitment to adhering to legal requirements and managing permitting through legislative avenues, rather than executive action.
“I support responsible usage of minerals, especially those that lead us to a clean energy economy,” Walz said in 2019, emphasizing the need for thorough risk assessments for each project.
The proposed mining projects pose significant concerns for tribes such as the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, who fear that pollutants could jeopardize their wild rice crops, a dietary staple integral to their culture. Outreach to various Anishinaabe and Dakota communities in Minnesota for comments on Walz’s record yielded no responses.
Knopf has called for a legislative measure requiring foreign mining companies to provide evidence of safe sulfide mining practices in the U.S. before proceeding with projects in Minnesota. However, he noted that Democrats have been hesitant to organize hearings on this issue.
While acknowledging Walz’s positive contributions to climate and energy initiatives, Kathryn Hoffman, CEO of the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, expressed disappointment that state agencies under his administration defended permits for the contested NorthMet mine instead of reevaluating them.
Hoffman hopes that Walz’s national visibility during his presidential campaign will allow him to adopt a broader perspective and advocate for stronger mining regulations and increased focus on mineral recycling.
Over the years, Walz has made clear his personal connections to the Boundary Waters, an area he holds dear due to both recreational activities and family ties. He has consistently advocated for the protection of this territory from mining incursions.
Ingrid Lyons, executive director of the Campaign to Save the Boundary Waters, asserted that Walz appreciates the significance of this wilderness area and has advocated for enhanced protections against mining threats.
Despite the state agencies’ progress in safeguarding the Boundary Waters under his leadership, reactions from some Iron Range communities indicate frustration with federal restrictions, particularly after the Biden administration’s recent decisions to withdraw large tracts of land from mining exploration.
Former President Donald Trump has seized upon this regional discontent as part of his campaign rhetoric, promising to reverse such restrictions if elected. He has criticized Walz’s record, suggesting he has not prioritized mining interests.
However, industry representatives and unions emphasize that Walz is not anti-mining. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources continues to defend NorthMet mine permits in court, asserting that it does not take positions for or against projects but must uphold its regulatory decisions.
Supporters like Julie Lucas, executive director of MiningMinnesota, contend that Walz understands the importance of minerals for clean energy and highlights the necessity of thoughtful permitting practices that consider environmental impacts while acknowledging job creation opportunities.
As the debate over mining continues, Ramirez remains optimistic about Walz’s support for the mining sector, highlighting his active engagement with miners and unions throughout the state.