As the 2024 presidential election approaches, speculation arises about the implications of a potential second term for Donald Trump, particularly regarding his age. Should Trump win, he would enter office at 78, the oldest president in history. This raises concerns about the possibility of him not completing his term, making it crucial to consider the governing style of his potential vice president, Ohio Senator JD Vance.
Vance, who gained fame with his book “Hillbilly Elegy,” has shifted from being a voice for the white working class to aligning with far-right influences, particularly billionaire Peter Thiel. His connections to the so-called “TheoBros,” a group advocating for a return to traditional Christian values intertwined with an exclusionary view of American identity, further color concerns about his potential presidency.
Political analysts like Harvard’s Steve Levitsky suggest that Vance could either follow a traditional Republican route focusing on pragmatic policies or embrace the extremist views he has been associated with. His statements, such as advocating for the removal of civil servants and aligning with anti-democratic narratives, hint at the latter.
If elected president, Vance’s policies may include enforcing a nationwide abortion ban without exceptions for rape or incest, targeting transgender rights by pushing for restrictive legislation on gender-affirming care, and reducing support for Ukraine in favor of confronting China. Economically, he advocates for raising the minimum wage modestly while expressing anti-immigrant sentiments and proposing tariffs to protect U.S. manufacturing.
Vance also expresses skepticism towards unions and has a history of supporting legislation that limits protest rights, particularly against policies he supports. His vision for a reshaped federal government includes purging civil service positions in favor of loyalists, raising alarm about his commitment to democratic principles.
The potential for a Vance presidency raises significant questions about the direction of American democracy and governance, particularly regarding its foundational values. While the perspectives presented in this analysis paint a concerning picture of Vance’s ambitions, it’s essential to consider that this potential outcome is contingent on the electoral process and public response. Voter engagement and advocacy for democratic practices will be critical in countering authoritarian tendencies and ensuring a government that reflects the will of the people.
In summary, as the nation gears up for the 2024 election, the possible elevation of JD Vance as a leader alongside Trump could steer U.S. politics toward divisive policies that challenge established democratic norms. Citizens must stay informed and involved to advocate for a governance that upholds representation, inclusion, and democratic values.