The UFC’s announcement of its first major events for 2026 has sparked significant confusion and criticism among fans and fighters alike. Paddy Pimblett is set to challenge Justin Gaethje for the interim lightweight title, while Diego Lopes will get a rematch against featherweight champion Alexander Volkanovski—less than a year after losing to him. Many believe this decision overlooks deserving contenders in both divisions.
Critics, including UFC veteran Matt Brown, emphasize that the situation reflects a troubling monopoly in the sport. Brown voiced concerns over how fighters like Arman Tsarukyan, currently ranked No. 1 in the lightweight division, remain sidelined despite expressing readiness to compete again. Tsarukyan had a strong showing in November with a submission victory over Dan Hooker, further solidifying his case for a title shot.
Instead of acknowledging Tsarukyan’s performance, the UFC chose Pimblett and Gaethje for the interim title fight. The winner is expected to face current lightweight champion Ilia Topuria. This decision could potentially delay Tsarukyan’s opportunity for a title shot until 2027, a consequence of the UFC’s rankings and matchmaking choices.
Brown pointedly critiqued the selection process, questioning the merit of having rankings if fighters like Tsarukyan are overlooked. “What do you have to do to get a title shot? When you’ve earned it, you’ve earned it,” he stated, highlighting the frustration felt by many in the sport regarding the apparent disregard for merit in favor of popularity.
Pimblett’s own record does not reflect a solid claim to the title shot, as he has not defeated any top-10 opponents in the UFC, with recent victories coming against low-ranked fighters. Gaethje, while a seasoned competitor, is also coming off an unconvincing win against a fighter who was underprepared. Brown’s critique points out that the current trend favors flashy personalities over proven skill and performance.
The featherweight division faces similar dilemmas. Lopes’s rematch with Volkanovski raises eyebrows, especially with undefeated fighters like Movsar Evloev and Lerone Murphy waiting for their chance. Brown argued that Lopes has not demonstrated significant advancements since their first fight, thus questioning the rationale behind his rematch.
Both cases illustrate a broader concern within the UFC regarding the matchmaking process and the treatment of dedicated athletes seeking title shots based on their performances. As fighters stress their desire to excel based on their athleticism rather than social media presence, the challenge for the UFC lies in balancing entertainment value with athletic merit.
This situation highlights an ongoing conversation in mixed martial arts about how to reward talent and performance effectively while managing the business side of the promotion. As the UFC moves forward, fans will be watching closely to see if those who deserve the opportunity to compete for titles will ultimately receive their shot in the octagon.