During a recent Turning Point USA conference, President-elect Donald Trump expressed his dissatisfaction with Panama regarding fees for using the Panama Canal. He labeled the charges as “exorbitant” and “highly unfair” to American shipping and naval operations. Trump stated that if these fees are not reduced upon his assumption of office, he would seek to have the canal returned to U.S. control, asserting, “This complete rip-off of our country will immediately stop.” His comments incited a strong response from Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino, who emphasized that the sovereignty of Panama and its control over the canal is non-negotiable.
The Panama Canal, a crucial maritime passage built in the early 1900s, was controlled by the U.S. until gradually being handed over to Panama through treaties, culminating in full Panamanian control in 1999. Each year, approximately 14,000 ships transit the canal, which connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and serves as a significant conduit for global trade.
Trump’s remarks indicate a potential shift in U.S. foreign policy, as he also criticized Canada and Mexico for what he termed unfair trade practices. By revisiting themes of trade fairness and national interests, Trump continues to rally his supporters around a platform focused on American dominance in global commerce.
In a broader context, Trump’s comments highlight ongoing discussions about trade policy and international agreements that shape economic relations. While some may view his approach as aggressive, it reflects a drive for stronger negotiations that could ultimately foster a more favorable environment for U.S. businesses and trade practices.
This situation emphasizes the importance of maintaining respectful and constructive diplomatic relationships to avoid escalating tensions, especially in crucial trading corridors like the Panama Canal. It also suggests the opportunity for renewed discussions on trade practices that could benefit both the U.S. and Panama.