The ongoing tribunal examining the suspension of Corrections Commissioner Dr. Jalesi Nakarawa has unveiled serious allegations through testimonies from four witnesses. Key concerns raised include claims that Dr. Nakarawa’s wife conducted drug tests on officers and that his stepson was permitted to train despite not fulfilling the standard entry criteria.
A particularly striking testimony came from officer Adrian Bukavulo, who detailed his experience regarding a drug test. During a briefing on February 4, it was announced that he and his colleagues would be tested by Dr. Nakarawa’s wife. Bukavulo later received a termination notice citing a positive result for methamphetamine. However, further investigation revealed that the lab results indicated MDMA, which differs significantly from methamphetamine in terms of effects and addiction potential. This discrepancy raised questions about the accuracy and fairness of the testing process, especially since Bukavulo had documentation for a prescription painkiller that could lead to such a result. Despite this evidence, Dr. Nakarawa reportedly refused to reconsider Bukavulo’s termination.
Lab technician Shalvin Prakash emphasized during his testimony the potential for urine tests to show drug use for several months, advising Bukavulo to seek professional medical guidance for clarification regarding his results. Additional testimonies brought to light troubling practices within the recruitment process of the Fiji Corrections Service, particularly surrounding Dr. Nakarawa’s stepson. Allegations suggested that he was allowed to bypass critical aptitude testing due to his family connections.
Further investigation uncovered misuse of the FCS Welfare and Sports Fund for personal expenses involving both Mrs. Nakarawa and high-ranking officials, as noted by Apolosa Vere, the FCS Director of Planning and Development. This inquiry highlighted significant governance issues within the Fiji Corrections Service and a disregard for established protocols.
With the tribunal scheduled to run until November 14, the primary objective is to evaluate the allegations against Dr. Nakarawa, fostering a climate of transparency and accountability in a crucial public institution. Many observers are hopeful that the findings will lead to essential reforms within the Fiji Corrections Service, ultimately rebuilding public trust in governance and encouraging a commitment to operational excellence and ethical standards in public service. As the hearings progress, there is an expectation that necessary changes will be implemented to prevent future misconduct and uphold integrity within the corrections system.