Tennis fans have expressed their strong reactions on social media after an intense on-air exchange between analysts CoCo Vandeweghe and Sloane Stephens during a broadcast of the 2025 French Open on TNT Sports. The moment unfolded while the duo was discussing Coco Gauff’s semifinal match against French wildcard Loïs Boisson, leaving many viewers taken aback by the apparent hostility in Vandeweghe’s responses.
Fans criticized Vandeweghe for her confrontational demeanor, especially after she interrupted Stephens mid-discussion. During the segment, Stephens made a calm observation about how Gauff needed to manage crowd pressure, emphasizing the importance of staying composed. However, Vandeweghe’s interjection, which came off as dismissive, prompted many viewers to perceive her as aggressive and overbearing.
Footage of the interaction quickly circulated on various platforms, sparking a wave of commentary from viewers. Some praised Stephens for her poise and restraint, arguing that Vandeweghe’s style was more about self-promotion rather than insightful analysis. Many fans commented that Vandeweghe’s consistent interruptions and tone suggested a hint of jealousy toward current players who have had greater success in singles competition.
Fans also noted the contrast between the two former pros, with several indicating that they believe Stephens has the potential to evolve into a strong commentator as she gains experience. In contrast, they described Vandeweghe’s delivery as uninterruptible and focused too heavily on herself.
This incident has opened up a wider discussion about commentary styles in tennis, with fans calling for a more balanced and respectful dynamic between analysts. Critics of Vandeweghe hope to see a shift in her approach, arguing that her tendency to dominate the conversation detracts from the viewing experience.
Despite the criticism, this moment could serve as an opportunity for both analysts to reflect on their roles and improve their interactions moving forward. In the world of sports commentary, varying perspectives can lead to enriching discussions when handled with professionalism and respect, adding valuable depth to analysis during major tournaments.