Teen’s Tragic Crime: Did Intent Expose the Truth?

A psychiatrist has determined that Carly Gregg, a 15-year-old accused of fatally shooting her mother and injuring her stepfather, does not qualify for an insanity defense. During a detailed analysis of video footage, the psychiatrist observed Carly’s behavior, noting moments of visible anxiety and frustration. At one point, Carly appears to retrieve a small object, which the psychiatrist speculates could be a vape pen.

The psychiatrist described Carly’s movements as purposeful and methodical. In the footage, Carly is seen leaning forward, contemplating her actions before walking quickly to a location where a firearm was stored. The psychiatrist argued this indicated a significant level of intent, memory, and motor function, contrasting her actions with random or disorganized behavior. The careful approach suggested an awareness of her surroundings, as she glanced around a corner to ensure her intended victim was not present.

Further observations included Carly sidestepping in a manner that concealed the firearm from a surveillance camera, reinforcing the argument that she recognized the gravity of her actions. After the shooting, she allegedly accessed her mother’s phone, managed to unlock it, and texted her stepfather a seemingly innocent message. The psychiatrist characterized this action as calculated, underscoring its intentional nature and asserting that it reflects cognitive functioning inconsistent with a dissociative state or psychotic episode.

Overall, the psychiatrist’s assessment emphasizes that Carly’s behavior leading up to and following the incident demonstrates a clear understanding of her actions and their consequences, which undermines any claims of insanity.

Popular Categories


Search the website