The Tamavua Action Group (TAG) has urged the Government to appeal a High Court ruling that dismissed an application for Stay of Execution Orders regarding the controversial Great Han development project. The group expressed disappointment that the case focused narrowly on the approval of additional floors for Buildings 1 and 2, suggesting this perspective assumes that the development complies with the Environment Management Act, which TAG contests.
TAG argues that the comprehensive six-building development plan has not undergone an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and lacks an approved Environmental Action Plan, which are critical for ensuring the project’s safety and compliance with environmental standards. They referenced a 2023 report from the Technical Review Committee, which underscored various risks tied to advancing with the project absent an EIA.
Concerns highlighted by TAG include ongoing geological risks within the area, increased traffic congestion along Princes Road, and enduring water shortages faced by Tamavua residents. The group criticized recent court decisions for placing undue trust in the assurances from the Mineral Resources Department (MRD) regarding geological fault risks along the Tamavua-i-Wai ridge, which they believe can lead to serious oversight.
Moreover, TAG pointed out that Engineers Fiji has indicated the geological investigations performed by the MRD were insufficient to address the scope of the proposed development adequately. This raises serious questions about whether the courts possess a complete understanding of the potential risks involved.
TAG emphasized that neglecting vital environmental requirements for the Great Han project could establish a hazardous precedent for future large-scale developments, potentially leading to increased demands for similar waivers from environmental protections. Consequently, the group has reiterated its call for the Government to contest the ruling, emphasizing that this issue reflects broader concerns surrounding environmental safeguards, public safety, and the long-term ramifications of major developments for the community.
This appeal could signify a critical point for regulatory practices, ensuring that environmental assessments remain a priority in future developments.