The film “Reagan,” directed by Sean McNamara, presents a largely reverential portrayal of the 40th U.S. President, often feeling more like a condensed biography than a thorough historical account. Based on Paul Kengor’s book, “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism,” the screenplay by Howard A. Klausner takes viewers through notable moments of Reagan’s life with remarkable speed.
The film is particularly tailored for an older audience familiar with Reagan’s dual legacy as a Hollywood actor and politician. For instance, viewers might be puzzled by the presence of a “King’s Row” poster in Reagan’s office without any context provided, hinting at a lack of deeper exploration into his Hollywood days.
One humorous moment occurs when a member of Reagan’s political team references the famous phrase “Win one for the gipper!”—which could leave younger audiences confused if they do not remember its origin from Reagan’s acting days. This is emblematic of a broader trend in the film, where it seems to target those already sympathetic to Reagan’s conservative views and religious convictions, potentially alienating younger viewers.
Dennis Quaid portrays Reagan convincingly, showcasing his charm and determination, whether he’s confronting Communists during his time as Screen Actors Guild president or negotiating with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. However, Jon Voight’s role as an aging ex-KGB agent adds depth, as he provides insights into Reagan’s impact on history.
The narrative jumps between various key events in Reagan’s life, beginning with the 1991 assassination attempt and then delving into his childhood and early adult life. It portrays his marriage to actress Jane Wyman and his eventual relationship with Nancy Davis, suggesting a continuous theme of his rise amidst personal struggles.
While the film touches on important aspects of Reagan’s career, including his political ascent and presidency, it glosses over more controversial topics such as the Iran-Contra scandal and his response to the AIDS crisis. Ultimately, “Reagan” serves more as a tribute than a comprehensive historical account, presenting a perspective that may engage viewers while offering little more than a surface-level exploration of his life and legacy.