Senator Rand Paul expressed his firm opposition to any U.S. military involvement in Greenland during an interview on “CBS Mornings,” amidst discussions by the White House about the acquisition of the territory. Paul stated, “It won’t happen under my watch,” emphasizing his dedication to prevent any military takeover.
As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Paul has consistently resisted offensive military action abroad. He previously voted for a war powers resolution aimed at limiting presidential war authority, particularly regarding military engagement in Venezuela, although Senate Republicans ultimately blocked the resolution. Following recent military strikes ordered by the Trump administration, a new war powers resolution is expected to be introduced in the Senate this week.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the administration’s interest in Greenland and mentioned that using military options is always considered within presidential authority. However, sources indicated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio assured Congress that any acquisition of Greenland would be pursued through purchase rather than force.
Acknowledging the historical context of U.S. territorial acquisitions, Paul did not oppose the idea of purchasing Greenland, citing past examples such as the Louisiana Purchase and Alaska. He stressed that any such acquisition would require a respectful process involving the consent of Greenland’s residents, asserting, “I think the people of Greenland are inclined to do” this.
Paul noted that for Greenland to join the U.S., there would need to be prospects for the citizens that would make membership beneficial. He also highlighted the necessity for a majority vote among the population declaring independence from Denmark before any U.S. involvement could be considered legitimate.
While acknowledging discussions surrounding military expansion, Paul clarified that his intention has never been to pursue Greenland through aggression. He urged the importance of maintaining Congress’s constitutional authority in declaring war, stating, “Doesn’t mean I have anything against President Trump… But I do think the constitutional debate is an important one.”
As the conversation around U.S. involvement in Greenland continues, Paul’s steadfast stance against military intervention underscores the ongoing discussions regarding foreign policy and territorial expansion. His advocacy for diplomacy over aggression reflects a continuing debate about the appropriate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches in matters of war and peace.