Supporters of Kilmar Abrego Garcia rallied outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, on July 7, 2025, as a hearing addressed his potential deportation. The rally was led by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, along with advocates from CASA de Maryland and fellow union members, emphasizing the personal stakes involved in Garcia’s legal battle.
During the proceedings, an official from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Thomas Giles, provided testimony concerning the deportation process Garcia could face if released from custody in Tennessee. However, Giles revealed limited involvement with Garcia’s specific case, stating he had only been briefed shortly before his testimony and lacked substantial experience in handling similar deportation issues.
Garcia, a Salvadoran native, has faced challenges since his deportation to El Salvador in March despite a previous court order preventing such action due to fears of persecution. The Trump administration had labeled him a member of the notorious MS-13 gang, a claim he refutes. Recently returned to the U.S., he faces accusations of smuggling undocumented migrants while residing in Maryland, to which he has pleaded not guilty.
As the hearing unfolds, government attorneys presented various options for Garcia’s deportation, including potential relocation to a third country besides El Salvador. In response, Garcia’s lawyers argued for his transfer to Maryland for trial as they navigate the complexities of his case.
Beyond the testimony, questions arose regarding the likelihood of Garcia being sent to a country in which he has no ties. Giles acknowledged the unusual nature of such scenarios, stating that detainees have the right to contest their deportation due to claims of fear regarding potential persecution.
Judge Paula Xinis, overseeing the case, announced that the hearing would continue, as questions about the policies and decisions affecting Garcia’s potential deportation remained unresolved.
This ongoing legal battle highlights broader concerns about immigration and deportation practices, reflecting the anxieties and advocacy of families and supporters seeking justice and protection for individuals facing potential harm. The outcome of Garcia’s case may influence the approach to similar cases in the future, particularly regarding deportations to third countries.
The community rallying together signifies resilience and hope in the quest for justice, showcasing the power of collective action in the face of adversity.