Opposition Member of Parliament Jone Usamate has raised concerns regarding accountability in the wake of a High Court ruling that deemed the dismissal of Barbara Malimali unlawful. He has specifically questioned why Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has not faced an investigation following this ruling.
In a statement issued yesterday, Usamate highlighted that Prime Minister Rabuka has effectively placed himself in a legally precarious position similar to that of former Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama, who was disqualified from Parliament in the past. Usamate expressed that the situation transcends mere legal opinions among lawyers in New Zealand, calling it a “documented breach of the Crimes Act” and a failure to adhere to the standards outlined in the delayed Code of Conduct.
Citing Section 139 of the Crimes Act, which pertains to abuse of office, Usamate pointed out that the High Court has already established that Malimali’s removal was void and outside the Prime Minister’s authority. He noted, “The High Court has already done the heavy lifting for the prosecutors,” suggesting that significant groundwork has been laid for potential legal action.
Usamate also highlighted the implications of Rabuka’s public admission regarding his unilateral decision-making. The Prime Minister stated, “This one I made on my own,” which Usamate interpreted as a confession that could have legal ramifications. He emphasized that good intentions cannot serve as a defense for unlawful actions, calling for equal treatment under the law.
“Why then is the Prime Minister not being investigated and prosecuted on this matter? Why are leaders being treated differently? Why is the will of the people not being put first?” Usamate questioned, advocating for accountability and transparency in government actions.
This growing scrutiny of the Prime Minister’s decisions and conduct may encourage a more equitable legal process in the future, reflecting the public’s demand for accountability from their leaders.