Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has indicated that he may consider resigning if the government’s appeal against a recent High Court decision does not succeed. In an interview with The Fiji Times, he acknowledged the gravity of the situation, framing his possible resignation as a serious option should the court ruling be upheld. “I will consider it. I am considering it,” Rabuka affirmed, emphasizing the importance of personal accountability. “Yes. That is an option,” he added when pressed further on the matter.
The case in question revolves around the dismissal of former FICAC commissioner Barbara Malimali. Rabuka took personal responsibility for the controversial decision, distancing others in his administration from the blame. He stated, “If the appeal process failed, then I must admit that I made the wrong decision or gave the wrong advice. Nobody else gave that advice. I made it.”
Despite potential public backlash regarding the cost of another legal challenge, Rabuka defended his decision to appeal the High Court ruling, asserting his constitutional rights as a citizen of Fiji. He expressed, “So is the judge. So, I will have to exercise the right that I have as a citizen of Fiji.” He emphasized the need to pursue all legal channels and ultimately take the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary.
Furthermore, in light of his legal decisions, Rabuka addressed questions about his confidence in the legal advice being provided to his government, especially as Fiji approaches elections. He acknowledged that while he had consulted with the Attorney-General, certain circumstances had limited his access to legal advice at critical moments. Consequently, he stated that he reverted to the Constitution, citing sections 81 and 82 as the basis for advising the President in his decision-making.
Rabuka’s reflective stance on potential resignation signals a commitment to uphold accountability and transparency while navigating the complexities of governance and legal scrutiny in Fiji. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the Prime Minister’s resolve to appeal highlights his dedication to pursuing legal recourse, potentially shaping the future of his administration and public trust in the government.