In a significant escalation of its ongoing conflict with Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that he has ordered a strike on Ukraine utilizing a new type of intermediate-range ballistic missile. This development comes in response to Ukraine’s recent attacks on Russian targets, enabled by longer-range weapons supplied by the U.S. and the U.K.
During a televised address, Putin declared the missile strike to be a “test” of this new weapon, asserting that Russia has the right to retaliate against nations supplying arms to Ukraine. Sabrina Singh, Deputy Defense Department press secretary, confirmed that the missile represents a newly designed lethal capability based on the RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile, causing concern due to its potential for carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads.
While Russia informed U.S. officials about the strike through nuclear risk reduction communication channels, analysts interpret the use of an intermediate-range missile as a clear warning to Ukraine and its allies, including Washington and NATO countries. These missiles can strike targets significantly beyond Ukraine, amplifying the seriousness of Russia’s message.
Despite the tensions, a U.S. official emphasized that Russia’s attempts to intimidate Ukraine will not be effective. This spokesperson reiterated that the U.S. plans to continue providing military support to Ukraine, including air defense systems and ammunition, amidst ongoing conflict.
The announcement coincides with Ukraine’s advancement in utilizing long-range missiles, marking a shift in combat dynamics that has reportedly incited a stronger response from Russia. Additionally, Russia has recently modified its nuclear doctrine to justify potential strikes against non-nuclear states backed by nuclear powers, a move perceived by Western officials as a rhetorical tactic rather than a shift toward actual nuclear engagement.
Despite the escalation in rhetoric and missile use, experts believe the risk of nuclear engagement remains low, especially as Russian forces have gained momentum on the battlefield in recent months. Analyst Alexander Bollfrass noted that utilizing nuclear weapons could jeopardize Russia’s diplomatic relations, particularly with neutral or supportive states crucial for its war economy.
In summary, while the conflict between Ukraine and Russia intensifies, the likelihood of a nuclear escalation appears minimal. As military and political strategies evolve, the international community continues to monitor developments closely while supporting Ukraine in its defense efforts. There remains hope that diplomatic efforts could eventually pave the way for a resolution to this protracted conflict.