June is recognized as Pride Month, celebrating the contributions of LGBTQ individuals throughout American history. However, the Pentagon, under Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, seems to be taking a different approach. Hegseth’s leadership has led to a perceived marginalization of the achievements and humanity of women and minorities in the U.S. military.
This past week, the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk, a vessel named after the pioneering gay rights activist and former Navy officer, was highlighted as a significant move against the LGBTQ community. Milk, who faced a “less than honorable” discharge in 1955 due to his sexual orientation, has become an enduring symbol for gay rights. The timing of the announcement coinciding with Pride Month is seen as a deliberate affront to the approximately 80,000 LGBTQ+ service members currently serving in the U.S. military.
Hegseth’s patterns, which reportedly include erasing contributions from nonwhite and female members of the armed forces, align with his broader criticisms of diversity programs and what he refers to as military “wokeness”. His administration has engaged in efforts to remove mentions of diversity from Pentagon communications, leading to the deletion of numerous images and accomplishments that highlight the roles of women and minorities in the military.
These actions have sparked criticisms regarding the inclusivity of the military under Hegseth’s leadership. His administration’s policies have included reinstating bans on transgender service members and downsizing initiatives aimed at enhancing the representation of women in leadership roles.
The implications of Hegseth’s strategies suggest a narrowing perspective on the identity and capabilities of military personnel, challenging the historical role of the military as a force for racial and social equality in America—a role exemplified by President Truman’s decision to integrate the armed forces in 1948.
Comments from Defense Department officials portray Hegseth’s vision as one of creating a “colorblind, merit-based culture.” However, the apparent exclusion of diverse figures and a refusal to recognize the contributions of those from marginalized communities raises questions about what merit truly means in a modern military context.
As the military moves forward, it is crucial to reflect on the importance of diversity and inclusion, not only for the strength of the armed forces but also for the fabric of American society. Embracing a variety of perspectives and experiences can enhance problem-solving capabilities and reflect the nation’s ideals more accurately.