Osgood Perkins, a notable figure in the horror genre, has made headlines with his critical stance on Netflix’s latest offering, “Monster: The Ed Gein Story.” Despite the show’s significant viewership since its premiere earlier this month, Perkins, known for films like “Longlegs,” openly expressed his unwillingness to watch the series, emphasizing he wouldn’t engage with it “with a 10-foot pole.”
The reason for Perkins’ strong response stems from the show’s portrayal of his late father, Anthony Perkins, a renowned actor best known for his role as Norman Bates in the iconic “Psycho.” In the second episode of “Monster,” which chronicles the life of notorious killer Ed Gein and its influence on Hollywood horror, Anthony is depicted as a closeted gay actor entangled in a secret relationship with fellow actor Tab Hunter. This narrative choice sparked concern for Perkins, who believes the series presents a glamorized and simplified portrayal of real-life events, straying from the authentic complexities of human experiences.
In an interview with TMZ, Perkins refrained from addressing the depiction of his father directly since he has no intention of viewing the show but took the opportunity to voice his worries regarding the “Netflix-ization of real pain.” He articulates that streaming services are transforming true crime into a commercialized genre, aiming to infuse it with superficial glamour and meaning, which he feels diminishes the actual, profound struggles faced by individuals in true crime narratives. He stressed the importance of preserving the truth of such narratives without reducing them, advocating for a deeper exploration into “the unknowable” and promoting an empathetic approach to storytelling.
Perkins’ sentiment reflects a growing concern among creatives in the entertainment industry about the risks of sensationalizing real-life tragedies for profit, sparking broader conversations about the responsibilities that come with depicting true stories. As the landscape of onscreen storytelling evolves, artists like Perkins highlight the need for balance where authentic representation and artistic innovation can coexist, ultimately enriching the viewer’s experience while honoring the complexities of real events.
In light of Perkins’ reflections, the discussion prompts viewers to consider the implications of how true crime narratives are shaped in the media and the ethical responsibilities that come with them. As more filmmakers and storytellers confront the balance between entertainment and authenticity, there is a hopeful prospect for the future of dramatized storytelling to cultivate a deeper understanding and appreciation of human experiences.