The FDA has escalated a recall alert related to certain sugar substitutes, indicating that consumption may lead to temporary or medically reversible adverse health effects. The recall originated from NuNaturals Inc, based in Eugene, Oregon, which discovered that its stevia extract was incorrectly labeled as monk fruit and vice versa.
This recall specifically impacts 78 bottles each of powdered stevia and monk fruit, which have been distributed to retailers nationwide. These products, which carry best-by dates of April 2028, are still under an ongoing recall status.
While allergies to stevia and monk fruit are generally rare, research has suggested that individuals with ragweed allergies might experience negative reactions to stevia, which is in the same family of plants. Symptoms of allergy can range from mild to severe, including skin rashes, swelling, rapid pulse, breathing difficulties, and a swollen tongue. However, it’s important to note that there have been no reported incidents of consumers becoming ill or reacting allergically to the affected products from NuNaturals.
The specific affected items include Pure Monk Fruit Sweetener (UPC 7 39223 00187 6, Lot number 25104S) and Organic Pure Stevia (UPC 7 39223 00204 0, Lot number 25104S). Although the precise states where these products were shipped have not been disclosed, NuNaturals supplies thousands of grocery stores across the U.S.
Experts have acknowledged that sugar substitutes like stevia and monk fruit offer significant advantages, especially for individuals with diabetes, as they do not trigger blood sugar spikes. However, concerns regarding their extensive use have emerged in recent years. Some studies involving animal models suggest that stevia might disrupt the balance of gut bacteria, potentially affecting various bodily functions, while monk fruit lacks extensive research regarding its long-term effects on health.
In light of the recall, consumers are advised to check labels carefully. The FDA emphasizes that food producers must recall products when mislabeling occurs or if there are potential health hazards involved.
This situation underscores the importance of transparency in food labeling and the necessity for consumers with food allergies to remain vigilant. As the market for sugar substitutes continues to grow, understanding their effects and any associated risks is crucial for informed consumption.