The National Education Association (NEA), the largest teachers’ union in the United States, is facing criticism for its recent shift from educational priorities to overt political activism. As the only labor union with a federal charter, granted by Congress in 1906, the NEA’s recent actions have prompted calls from some quarters for Congress to revoke this charter.
During its 2025 annual convention in Portland, the NEA approved several contentious resolutions that critics argue prioritize political ideology over the educational needs of students. One notable resolution earmarks $3,500 specifically for using the term “fascism” to describe the actions of former President Donald Trump, showcasing what some have termed a troubling mix of political rhetoric and educational missions.
The NEA’s shift has been contextualized against a backdrop of another resolution that dedicates $1,500 and staff effort to support the “No Kings” movement, aimed at opposing what they view as Trump’s authoritarianism. This has stirred deeper concerns over the union’s focus on political activism rather than student welfare and education.
Another significant resolution involved a commitment of over $200,000 for resources and training to incorporate LGBTQ+ topics into classrooms without parental consent, which critics claim undermines the rights of parents to guide their children’s education.
Adding to the controversy, NEA members also voted to sever ties with the Anti-Defamation League, further emphasizing the union’s shift towards a more partisan stance. The NEA’s current trajectory, some argue, deviates from its foundational purpose centered around student learning and has instead become focused on advancing a progressive political agenda.
Data indicates that the NEA overwhelmingly supports Democratic candidates, with approximately 98% of its political contributions in recent election cycles directed toward that party. This perceived political bias raises questions about the organization’s commitment to educational neutrality and improvement.
Critics, including several lawmakers, are arguing that it is time for Congress to reconsider the NEA’s federal charter. They claim that revoking this charter would diminish the union’s authority and signal that Congress does not endorse its increasingly political actions.
In light of these developments, there is hope that a renewed focus on educational priorities could emerge. Advocates stress the importance of returning the union’s attention to fostering a productive learning environment that benefits all students, rather than promoting a narrow political agenda.
The conversation surrounding the NEA is ongoing, and could potentially lead to significant changes in the relationship between Congress and the union. With a growing movement for educational freedom and choice, the future may hold new opportunities for reforms that prioritize student success over political affiliations.