Illustration of Navigating Polarization: The Divergent Paths of Hawley and Bush

Navigating Polarization: The Divergent Paths of Hawley and Bush

Political talent is often characterized by the ability to engage diverse groups without significant contradictions. Politicians typically begin with a core base, whether it be ideological, racial, geographic, or generational. Those with adaptability can not only grow their base but also convert critics into supporters.

Possessing political dexterity allows politicians to frame their beliefs differently depending on the audience, emphasizing particular issues and adopting appropriate demeanor while maintaining authenticity. Strong convictions can be admirable, especially when they lead to policies that positively affect the community, but this discussion focuses on political strategies rather than moral or policy specifics.

In Missouri, two highly polarizing politicians have emerged: U.S. Senator Josh Hawley and Representative Cori Bush. Hawley, elected in 2018, gained national notoriety by opposing the certification of the 2020 electoral college votes, a move linked to the events of January 6, 2021. He became a controversial figure, using imagery from that day for campaign fundraising, even as he resisted media demands to cease its use.

In late 2022, recognizing the political landscape, Hawley decided against a presidential run and opted for re-election in the U.S. Senate. He shifted his focus away from election denialism toward economic and cultural populism to attract Missouri swing voters. His legislative efforts included passing a bill for cancer victims linked to nuclear waste and advocating for Amazon drivers’ rights, which earned him favor from labor unions.

On the other hand, Cori Bush has taken a different approach since her re-election in 2022. She has embraced her more controversial stances rather than retreating from them. Despite declining public sentiment regarding the “defund the police” movement and scrutiny over her spending on personal security, she has remained steadfast in her position. Her past comments on Israel and her affiliations have sparked skepticism from the Jewish community, which she has not engaged to alleviate.

Bush’s confrontational strategy intensified with her controversial remarks following radical attacks in Israel, leading to an influx of political opposition, including St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell, who announced a primary challenge against her. Instead of moderating her views, Bush reinforced her positions, even in the face of overwhelming criticism.

While Hawley tactically navigated his political challenges by building alliances and shifting his messaging, Bush’s authenticity and adherence to her convictions set her apart, though it has led to her downfall in recent elections. Ultimately, Hawley’s skilled maneuvering allowed him to solidify his position, contrasting sharply with Bush’s more uncompromising stance, which may have cost her electoral support.

Popular Categories


Search the website