During a recent interview with psychologist and commentator Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk expressed strong opinions regarding gender-affirming care, particularly in relation to his estranged daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson. Musk described his daughter’s transition as a significant loss in his life, claiming that she was “killed” by the process, which he characterized as “child mutilation and sterilization.” This outburst reflects Musk’s ongoing criticism of what he sees as the dangers of influencing minors in matters of gender identity.
Musk recounted how he felt misled into supporting his child’s transition process during the pandemic when he was concerned for her mental well-being, stating that he was worried she might resort to suicide. He argued that the procedures involved are done to children who have not reached the age of consent and voiced a belief alongside Peterson that the promotion of such treatments is “incredibly evil,” calling for consequences for advocates of these practices. He also brought up the topic of puberty blockers, claiming that their implications for fertility were not adequately explained to him, despite the fact that puberty blockers themselves do not directly sterilize.
Musk’s comments coincide with his recent decision to relocate his companies, including X, SpaceX, and Tesla, from California to Texas, partially in response to California legislation (AB1955) prohibiting parental notification if a child identifies as transgender. This move has rekindled discussions around Musk’s perceived shift from centrist political views to more conservative stances, as he openly aligns with right-wing perspectives against clean energy initiatives and has supported Republican candidates.
In a personal dimension, Musk’s relationship with his daughter has deteriorated significantly. In 2022, she requested a name change and new birth certificate, stating she no longer wished to be connected to her father. Musk attributes this rift to the influence of her school, which he perceives as contributing to her progressive views.
Ultimately, this situation draws attention to the ongoing national debates surrounding transgender rights, parental authority, and the complexities of family dynamics in the face of rapidly evolving social issues.
While challenges persist within these discussions, there remains a collective hope for improved understanding and dialogue surrounding gender identity and parental involvement. The conversation around these themes could pave the way for greater empathy and awareness, fostering environments where families can navigate such differences with support and compassion.