In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Federal Aviation Administration took significant steps to enhance passenger safety by mandating reinforced cockpit doors remain locked during flights. This measure, along with other security protocols such as airport screenings and the military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, was deemed highly effective in thwarting future hijacking attempts. Similarly, following the January 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, federal and state governments have implemented various reforms to strengthen democracy. The Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022, which closed existing legal loopholes, is viewed by many as a critical legislative achievement.
However, experts caution that, just as fortified cockpit doors did not eliminate the threat of terrorism, the reforms introduced to protect elections may not fully safeguard against ongoing efforts to undermine the electoral process. As the midterm elections approach, numerous voting and election specialists have expressed their serious concerns about potential threats to democracy, particularly in light of former President Donald Trump’s influence.
Among these experts, Chioma Chukwu, executive director of American Oversight, highlighted the normalization of election denial as a troubling trend that undermines the legitimacy of electoral outcomes. She critiques the increasing willingness among some political figures to disregard legitimate results, which makes it easier to manipulate election laws and processes.
David J. Becker, from The Center for Election Innovation & Research, voiced concerns about efforts to centralize election authority at the federal level, which risks disrupting the traditional balance of power in electoral management outlined in the Constitution. He noted that such actions could paralyze election officials and fuel disinformation campaigns reminiscent of adversarial tactics from nations like Russia and China.
Marc Elias, a prominent voting rights attorney, warned of an expansive effort by the Trump administration to collect sensitive personal voter data, posing risks to individuals’ security and privacy. Meanwhile, Matthew Weil from the Bipartisan Policy Center pointed out that high turnover among election officials could lead to distrust in electoral outcomes, emphasizing the need for continued investment in a stable and trustworthy election infrastructure.
Concerns about mail-in ballots being rejected due to policy changes, ongoing voter suppression efforts affecting millions, and the potential for local complacency were echoed by various experts. They warned that systemic issues could ultimately affect the integrity of future elections and disenfranchise eligible voters.
The experts also expressed anxiety regarding the interference from government officials and the Trump administration’s tactics aimed at influencing election outcomes. Anna Baldwin from the Campaign Legal Center asserted the need for vigilance to protect voting rights amidst a looming threat of political manipulation that undermines democracy.
Mistrust in the electoral system has deepened, driven by the narrative of an anti-democracy movement that seeks to validate claims of electoral failures. Joanna Lydgate from the States United Democracy Center and Skye Perryman from Democracy Forward underscored the urgency for engaged voters and principled officials to rise in defense of democratic principles.
As the nation approaches a crucial election year, it is clear that the road to preserving democracy may face significant obstacles, but there remains hope in the resilience of democratic participation and accountability. With continued advocacy and awareness, Americans may find strength in defending their electoral rights and ensuring free and fair elections.