Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has formally intervened in the recent request by Consumers Energy for a substantial electric rate increase. The utility company has sought an annual hike of $436 million, which, if approved, could come into effect in May 2026. This initiative by Consumers Energy is believed to be one of the largest rate hikes in decades, as highlighted by AG Nessel.
The Attorney General emphasized the need to ensure that rate increases are just and reasonable, stating, “Before Consumers Energy, or anyone else for that matter, can even begin to measure any affordability or reliability improvements from their last rate hike, the company is back in business asking to bill their customers an additional $400 million annually.” She also criticized the utility for attempting to mislead the public about the severity of the proposed rates, affirming her commitment to protect Michigan consumers from what she termed corporate greed.
The rate hike request follows a $154 million increase approved by the Michigan Public Service Commission just two months prior. Additionally, Consumers Energy plans to implement a separate 12-month surcharge, which would raise household bills by approximately 13.3%.
In response, Consumers Energy has reiterated its commitment to providing reliable and affordable energy to nearly 2 million customers. They are confident that their proposed investments in infrastructure, including line maintenance and advanced technology, will enhance service reliability. The company acknowledges the financial struggles faced by many customers and remains dedicated to assisting those in need through various support programs.
This situation reflects ongoing discussions regarding energy costs, corporate responsibility, and consumer protection in Michigan’s utility sector. As this process unfolds, it underscores the importance of transparent communication between utility companies and their customers, which is essential for fostering trust and understanding.
The outlook remains hopeful as both parties strive to reach a fair resolution that balances the need for infrastructure investment with the financial capacity of ratepayers.