Wendy Williams’ attorney is pushing back against reports that alleged medical tests show she has dementia and aphasia, arguing the leaks are driven by self-interest and violate her rights.
Attorney Joe Tacopina says the leaked diagnosis is false and points to what he calls a “vested interest” by parties seeking to maintain Williams under a strict guardianship. He questions the legitimacy of the leak, asking where the actual medical report is and which doctor would be willing to testify under oath to face cross-examination, so the truth can be exposed.
Reports have circulated that a series of medical examinations indicated Williams has frontotemporal dementia and aphasia—the diagnosis Williams reportedly received in 2023. Williams’ court-appointed guardian, Sabrina Morrissey, recently filed documents signaling that Williams would undergo additional testing and urging the court to pause further litigation in her lawsuit with the network behind the documentary Where Is Wendy Williams? until guardianship matters are resolved.
Williams has expressed a desire to exit the guardianship arrangement. Earlier this year, sources said she demonstrated competence after being briefly released from her assisted-care facility to undergo capacity assessments.
Context and what to watch next:
– The guardianship proceeding and Williams’ status remain central to ongoing legal questions about her ability to manage personal and legal affairs.
– The dispute over leaked medical information highlights broader issues of medical privacy, guardianship rights, and transparency in how such evaluations are handled and shared.
Potential value-adds:
– A closer look at how guardianship cases intersect with medical privacy and celebrity rights could help readers understand similar disputes.
– If new documents or medical reports surface, those developments could shift the balance of the case or influence decisions about Williams’ guardianship.
Overall tone: The situation underscores a contentious legal battle over guardianship, medical assessments, and privacy, with Williams’ team contesting claims they view as improperly spread and potentially aimed at preserving a restrictive arrangement.