The proposed waste-to-energy power plant in Lautoka has faced significant backlash following recent consultations held this week. The facility, which aims to generate 80 megawatts of energy for Fiji’s national grid, is being spearheaded by The Next Generation Holdings (Fiji) Pte Limited, backed by Australian investor Ian Malouf. Local residents have expressed serious concerns about the potential health and environmental risks associated with the plant.
At the recent consultation, representatives from various organizations, including the Pacific Recycling Foundation, voiced strong opposition to the project. Josaia Cava, the corporate relations manager for Waste Recyclers Fiji Limited, emphasized the importance of honoring the land and its people in any development project. He urged that mutual respect must underpin foreign investments, stating, “You can have millions of dollars, but if there is no respect, then it shows you do not truly care about our people or our beautiful Fiji.”
Zoheb Shah, the Lautoka branch manager for WRFL, criticized the consultation process for lacking effective risk assessments and house-to-house surveys. He pointed out that the absence of thorough communication led to confusion and frustration among residents. This sentiment was shared by Amitesh Deo, founder of the Pacific Recycling Foundation, who highlighted the discontent towards Mr. Malouf’s earlier remarks that labeled local waste management efforts as a “disgrace.” Deo underscored that Fiji’s waste management challenges should be viewed through the lens of the country’s historical context and resource limitations.
Furthermore, the proposed plant would require around 900,000 tonnes of waste per year, with a substantial portion expected to be imported from abroad, which has raised additional concerns. Community members worry this could lead to valuable recyclable materials being sent to the facility instead of being properly processed.
The consultations held over three days in Saweni were intended to foster dialogue; however, many attendees felt they were treated condescendingly rather than being genuinely engaged. Deo reiterated that true partnership in development projects requires respect and acknowledgment of Fiji’s unique challenges and progress.
While the proposal aims to address energy needs, the strong pushback from the community reflects a growing desire for more responsible and respectful investment practices that genuinely consider local environmental and health implications. As the discussions continue, it is crucial for stakeholders to work collaboratively with the community to build trust and ensure that development efforts truly benefit all parties involved.