Tensions rose minutes before the second elimination on La Casa de los Famosos México as the house gathered for the positioning ritual, where each participant publicly stands behind the nominee they want to see leave and explains why. The nominees—Priscila Valverde, Mar Contreras, Adrián Di Monte, and Alexis Ayala—listened as their housemates laid out grievances, strategy, and loyalty.
Several contestants targeted Alexis Ayala, citing a shift in his attitude and comments they found out of line. Mariana Botas stood behind him, saying she felt disappointed by his change from the first week and by remarks she considered inappropriate toward some women. Shiky echoed that stance, arguing he was being consistent with the points he gave Alexis in nominations and criticizing him for not contributing enough to the show’s content. Facundo took a sharper tone, joking he brought a shovel to bury Alexis with his own words and accusing him of dismissing women’s time doing makeup while napping himself. Elaine Haro also said certain comments from Alexis felt off and out of place. Ninel Conde praised him as an artist but described a drastic change between week one and week two—after losses and nomination—calling him irritable and hurtful at times.
Alexis received each critique with measured replies, saying he’d look for value in their words, encouraging some to be more composed, and stressing he seeks order. He pushed back on the narrative that he avoids chores, insisted he respects everyone, and told his colleagues not to dim their own light. To Ninel, he argued not to project weakness onto him and said if he stays, he’ll continue contributing; if he leaves, he’ll do so with his head held high.
Priscila Valverde also drew multiple positions, largely framed as strategic or related to house dynamics. Aarón Mercury felt she had isolated herself and lacked initiative; Guana cited the tightening “room versus room” game and said more cooperation was needed; Aldo de Nigris pointed to a lack of connection and the conflict over being moved from his bed; Abelito said he wanted to avoid misunderstandings. Priscila responded calmly throughout, emphasizing she’s present for her teammates, recognizing others’ loyalty to their rooms, and noting that certain logistics—like reallocating beds—left her with limited options.
Dalílah Polanco, positioned behind Alexis, admitted she misjudged her nomination strategy and confessed she should have given him more points previously, reflecting a personal course correction. Throughout, host Galilea Montijo guided the live exchange as the house braced for the public’s decision on the second eviction.
What this moment reveals
– The positioning ritual is both catharsis and strategy. It surfaces private tensions, forces clear stances, and signals alliances to the audience.
– Alexis emerged as the most polarizing figure of the night. That can be risky inside the house, but it often galvanizes viewers—either in support or opposition—making him a central figure in the game’s narrative.
– Priscila’s critiques were less personal and more about group dynamics, suggesting a tactical push from opposing rooms as the house consolidates blocs.
Comment
Honest feedback under pressure can become a turning point in reality competitions. Alexis repeatedly said he would “find value” in the critiques—a constructive stance if followed by tangible change. Priscila’s composure in the face of strategic targeting could earn her goodwill. As quarters harden and the game gets tighter, clarity around roles, responsibilities, and respect in shared spaces may be the deciding factor in who thrives week to week.
Hopeful note
Even amid tension, several housemates acknowledged each other’s talents and potential. If they channel this candor into cooperation and personal growth, the house could shift from confrontation to sharper, more creative gameplay—something audiences typically reward.
Summary
– Housemates publicly positioned themselves against nominees before the second elimination.
– Alexis Ayala faced the most criticism for perceived attitude changes and controversial comments; he responded by acknowledging feedback and defending his conduct.
– Priscila Valverde was challenged mainly on integration and house cooperation, responding steadily and citing logistical constraints and room loyalties.
– The exchange underscored intensifying room alliances and set the stage for a pivotal public vote.