Daniel Penny was acquitted of criminally negligent homicide on Monday in connection with the death of Jordan Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man, who died after Penny placed him in a chokehold during a subway incident in May 2023. The jury spent over 24 hours deliberating for five days before reaching this verdict, which has sparked nationwide discussions on issues such as homelessness, mental health, safety, and race relations.
The incident occurred when Neely entered an uptown F train, reportedly behaving erratically and yelling. Penny’s defense argued that he acted to protect other passengers from Neely’s unpredictable behavior, while prosecutors asserted that he used excessive force. Witnesses reported a prolonged chokehold lasting approximately six minutes, with some suggesting that Penny continued to apply pressure even after Neely lost consciousness.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg expressed his respect for the jury’s deliberation process, highlighting their careful examination of evidence and witness testimonies. He also condemned the harassment faced by his team throughout the trial. Outside the courthouse, reactions were mixed, with some expressing outrage at the verdict while others celebrated it. Neely’s father, Andre Zachery, was visibly emotional during a press conference, expressing his deep grief and frustration over the outcome, calling the justice system “rigged.”
Despite the jury’s decision, Zachery and his legal representative remain hopeful for justice through a potential civil lawsuit against Penny. Donte Mills, an attorney for Neely’s family, voiced a commitment to pursue accountability through civil channels, emphasizing that the fight for justice is far from over.
The case has also drawn comparisons to previous instances of fatal encounters with law enforcement, most notably referencing the death of Eric Garner, whose mother condemned the chokehold as a recurring tragedy in society.
Ultimately, while the jury found Penny not guilty, the public discourse surrounding this case continues. It reflects a broader struggle regarding how society addresses mental health, homelessness, and the dynamics of safety in communal spaces. This case, and the reactions it elicited, underscore the need for compassionate and systemic solutions to tackle the root causes of such tragic incidents.
In a society grappling with complex issues, the hope remains that this verdict inspires further discussion and action to address homelessness and mental health with empathy and improved resources. It presents an opportunity to reevaluate our approaches to safety and support, fostering a more inclusive community for everyone.