A bipartisan coalition of over 130 retired judges has filed an amicus brief urging a federal court to dismiss charges against Wisconsin Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, citing concerns that her arrest undermines the long-established principle of judicial immunity. Dugan, arrested by FBI agents on April 25, faces federal charges related to her alleged interference with the arrest of Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who was detained during a federal operation at her courthouse.
The retired judges argue that Dugan is entitled to absolute immunity for her official actions, similar to the protections afforded to those in legislative and executive roles. They characterize the prosecution as an “egregious overreach” by the executive branch, warning that such actions threaten public trust in the judiciary and could deter judges from making independent decisions without fear of legal repercussions.
In their brief, the retired judges emphasized that prosecuting Dugan could create a chilling effect on judicial independence and jeopardize the established norms that uphold order and decorum in courthouses. Dugan, who has served in her position since 2016 and was reelected in 2022 unopposed, pleaded not guilty to the charges, which include concealing an individual to prevent arrest and obstruction. Her trial is scheduled to commence in the week of July 21.
As this case evolves, it raises significant questions about the balance of power and the protections necessary for judges to perform their duties without interference. The outcome may have lasting implications for judicial independence across the country, making it a pivotal moment for the legal community.