Boise State’s standout running back, Ashton Jeanty, delivered an impressive performance that secured the Broncos’ place in the College Football Playoff with a decisive 21-7 victory over UNLV in the Mountain West title game. Jeanty racked up 209 rushing yards on 32 carries and found the end zone once, showcasing his remarkable talent and athleticism on a critical night.
This outstanding display caps off a season that has many considering Jeanty a front-runner for the Heisman Trophy. As of now, he has amassed 344 carries for an astonishing 2,497 rushing yards, averaging an impressive 7.3 yards per carry and scoring 29 touchdowns. His remarkable numbers have made him a beacon of support among fans and analysts alike, especially in a heated competition for the prestigious award against Colorado’s versatile star Travis Hunter.
The discussion surrounding Jeanty also brings to light the historical context of Heisman voting, with many comparing his season to that of Melvin Gordon’s legendary 2014 campaign at Wisconsin. Despite Gordon’s record-breaking performance that year, the Heisman was awarded to Oregon quarterback Marcus Mariota, which sparked debate about the legitimacy of the decision. Former Wisconsin player Montee Ball echoed these sentiments, expressing that the award’s credibility diminished when Gordon was overlooked.
The parallels between Jeanty’s current season and Gordon’s unforgettable campaign create a narrative that raises questions about how running backs are evaluated in the Heisman voting process. Jeanty’s season is reminiscent of Gordon’s, and the outcry for recognition may fuel a drive for fairness as voting approaches.
In summary, Jeanty’s domination on the field has not only propelled his team into the playoffs but has also ignited a passionate discussion around the merits of his Heisman candidacy. With the College Football Playoff on the horizon, the hope remains that Jeanty’s exceptional efforts will receive the recognition they deserve, emphasizing that greatness in college football should not be overlooked.