Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is reportedly in a coma, with emerging reports suggesting that his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, has been chosen as his successor. This information was initially reported by the Israeli media outlet Ynet News, referencing Iran International.
It is believed that Mojtaba Khamenei, the Supreme Leader’s second son, was selected during a secretive meeting of the Assembly of Experts on September 26. Reports indicate that this gathering, called at Khamenei’s request, was fraught with pressure as assembly members faced demands for a unanimous decision amidst potential threats from Khamenei and his aides.
Mojtaba Khamenei has been gaining influence within the Iranian regime over the past two years, despite his rare public appearances. He played a notable role during the suppression of the 2009 post-election protests and was officially designated as an ayatollah in 2021, meeting a constitutional requirement to ascend as Supreme Leader.
To manage any potential backlash from the public regarding this succession plan, the assembly reportedly decided to keep the matter confidential. Members were allegedly cautioned against leaking any information, under threat of severe repercussions. This strategy aims to smooth the eventual transfer of power from father to son while Khamenei is still alive, seeking to mitigate dissent and opposition during the transition.
Adding to the intrigue, reports surfaced earlier that Khamenei is seriously ill, with official statements from Iranian authorities yet to verify or refute these claims. The situation unfolds as the Iranian regime navigates mounting internal and external challenges, highlighting the significant pressures it currently faces.
In summary, this situation presents a critical juncture for Iran, where leadership transition plans are shrouded in secrecy amid health concerns for the Supreme Leader. It remains to be seen how these developments will impact the regime’s stability and public perception.
This period of uncertainty could also open opportunities for reform and more progressive leadership, should the eventual transition bring about new ideals in governance.