Headline: Judge Rules Alina Habba Was Not Lawfully Serving as Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, Prompting Questions About Prosecutor Appointments
A federal judge in Pennsylvania has concluded that Alina Habba, the former personal attorney for President Donald Trump, is not legally serving as the acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey. The decision raises questions about how interim prosecutors are appointed and could spur review of the Trump administration’s approach to filling top federal posts when Senate confirmation is pending.
In a 77-page opinion, Judge Matthew Brann of the Middle District of Pennsylvania said there is no basis to regard Habba as qualified to perform the duties of the U.S. attorney in an acting capacity, and he barred her from participating in ongoing cases. The ruling could have wide-reaching consequences beyond New Jersey, as other acting U.S. attorneys have faced similar questions about their authority.
The decision comes as the Department of Justice plans to appeal. It also leaves in question how other interim appointees have been placed in top prosecutions around the country. Earlier this year, John Sarcone began serving as acting U.S. attorney in the Northern District of New York but did not secure an indefinite extension of his interim status from the court. In California and Nevada, other acting U.S. attorneys—Bilal Essayli and Sigal Chattah—were appointed before judges could reject extensions of their interim status.
Habba’s authority was challenged by defendants in two criminal cases who argued that her appointment violated federal law. The defendants—Julien Giraud Jr. and Julien Giraud III in drug-related charges, and Cesar Pina in a securities fraud case—moved to dismiss their indictments on that basis. Lawyers for Pina argued that the indictment was handed up after Habba’s term had expired.
Under federal law, interim U.S. attorneys can serve for up to 120 days. If no Senate-confirmed appointment is in place, district judges can designate a temporary replacement. When there is no U.S. attorney, the Federal Vacancies Reform Act typically makes the first assistant the acting U.S. attorney—yet in this case, that first assistant was fired after Habba’s appointment drew scrutiny.
Scholars noted that the ruling may limit the administration’s ability to bypass Senate-confirmed appointments and could compel a broader review of how agencies delegate authority when confirmation processes lag. Anne Joseph O’Connell, a professor at Stanford Law School, said the ruling could affect numerous acting officials named by the president under the FVRA, not just U.S. attorneys, and could push agencies to reexamine delegation practices to avoid disruptions to day-to-day operations.
The Justice Department has argued that the president has broad authority to place anyone in a top federal role on a temporary basis and that it is essential for key offices to continue functioning even in the absence of Senate-confirmed leadership.
Looking ahead, the judge signaled that the decision is likely to be appealed, potentially setting up an appellate ruling that could clarify the limits of acting appointments under the FVRA and the proper process for confirming or replacing U.S. attorneys.
Key takeaways
– A federal judge ruled that Alina Habba is not legally serving as acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey and must be disqualified from ongoing cases.
– The ruling could affect how interim federal prosecutors are appointed and questioned across multiple districts.
– The Justice Department plans to appeal, while other acting U.S. attorneys in various districts face similar scrutiny.
– The decision highlights ongoing tensions between executive branch appointment powers and the Senate confirmation process.
– Legal scholars suggest this could prompt broader scrutiny of delegation and appointment practices in federal agencies.
What this means going forward
– The District of New Jersey could need a new acting U.S. attorney or rely on a different interim arrangement until a Senate-confirmed successor is appointed.
– The ruling may encourage more rigorous review of acting appointments nationwide, potentially slowing or altering interim leadership during investigations and prosecutions.
– If the decision is upheld on appeal, it could reinforce the importance of adhering to the FVRA framework and the necessity of Senate confirmation for top federal prosecutors.
Summary
A federal judge has found that Alina Habba was not legally serving as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey, potentially reshaping how acting officials are appointed and prompting closer scrutiny of interim leadership in U.S. attorney offices nationwide. The case underscores ongoing debates over the balance between executive authority and congressional oversight, with the DOJ planning an appeal and the broader implications likely to unfold in courts and in future appointments.
Positive note
This development could strengthen adherence to formal appointment processes and ensure that high-level federal roles operate with clear authorization and oversight, supporting consistent legal standards and accountability across jurisdictions.
If you’d like, I can tailor this into a shorter explainer or a version optimized for a specific WordPress layout or audience.