Ro Naulu Mataitini, the chief of REWA, has articulated strong criticism regarding the uproar over electricity tariffs in Fiji, characterizing the situation as a study in political hypocrisy. In response to the remarks made by former attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum and Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu regarding the proposed 25 percent increase in electricity rates, he asserted that those most vocally protesting the price hike were in fact the very architects of the flawed system that led to the current crisis.
In a pointed social media post, Ro Naulu highlighted the irony of Sayed-Khaiyum, who once oversaw a government that eroded the autonomy of institutions, now advocating for the independence of the Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission (FCCC) and lamenting government interference. He underscored that this newfound dedication to regulatory purity was less about principle and more about political maneuvering aimed at undermining the current administration.
At the core of the tariff dispute, according to Ro Naulu, lies a significant financial challenge. He explained that the Electricity Fiji Limited (EFL) requires revenue, primarily driven by the need to deliver returns to its shareholders. He pointed out that while the Opposition criticizes the tariff hikes, they conveniently overlook the implications of the 2021 sale of a 44 percent stake in EFL to the Japanese firm Chugoku, which he believes has introduced profit expectations that complicate public affordability.
Ro Naulu agreed with Seruiratu’s characterization of a recent 21-day consultation pause as ‘political theatre,’ suggesting that it was staged by the Opposition, further revealing a disconnect between their criticism and the structural issues they contributed to.
This exchange invites a greater discussion about the sustainability of public utilities in an increasingly privatized environment and the importance of accountability from all political actors involved. The current situation may serve as a catalyst for more robust debates about governance, financial models in public services, and the need for transparency in the management of essential services. Ultimately, it highlights the pressing issue of how to balance public interests with the realities of corporate profit expectations in the energy sector.