Suva lawyer Richard Naidu has called for essential modifications to the proposed referendum bill in Fiji, expressing concerns about the potential adoption of the restrictive Singapore model from 1961 as suggested by some submitters. Naidu pointed out that Fiji enjoys notably more freedom of expression compared to Singapore and other countries, arguing that implementing such a model would be inappropriate and should be entirely dismissed.
Additionally, Naidu raised significant concerns regarding the administration of general elections in Fiji, insisting on the need for a comprehensive review of the electoral process to ensure fairness and maintain public confidence. His concerns resonate with a variety of submitters who have expressed their apprehensions regarding specific clauses in the referendum bill, while others have voiced support for the process, emphasizing the importance of conducting it in a democratic, transparent, and inclusive manner.
Faith Grace, a representative from the Stand With Niko Advocacy group, endorsed the Referendum Bill, highlighting the necessity for the public to have the ultimate authority in decision-making. She advocated for a more inclusive submission process, calling for online submissions to enhance public participation.
On the other hand, the Fiji Council of Social Services has expressed its opposition to Clauses 22 and 23 of the bill, which impose restrictions on public displays, campaigning, and voter persuasion, as well as allowing warrantless arrests that could result in fines or imprisonment.
Ratu Rakuita Vakalalabure, the Chairman of the Standing Committee on Justice and Law, underlined the significance of public engagement, encouraging citizens to share their opinions on the referendum bill during this crucial consultation phase before it is presented to Parliament for consideration as law.
The ongoing discussions surrounding the referendum bill highlight a vibrant civil society engagement, showcasing a commitment to uphold the democratic process in Fiji. This dialogue fosters a hopeful perspective for more inclusive governance and greater citizen involvement in shaping the nation’s future.