The bail review application for Ratu Lote Lewaivanua, one of two police officers arrested last month for allegedly importing and possessing 4.7 kilograms of liquid methamphetamine, has been denied. This decision was made by Magistrate Charles Ratakele, who found no substantial changes in circumstances to merit the review.
Lewaivanua, aged 31, was charged alongside his co-accused, Sevuloni Lubi, 43. In addition to the drug charges, Lewaivanua was reportedly found with $650, believed to be proceeds from criminal activity. He submitted his bail review application after being originally denied bail on September 15. During the hearing, Prosecutor Unal Lal reiterated the State’s objections to granting bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges.
Lewaivanua’s defense argued for bail based on the fact that he had acquired new legal representation and raised concerns about the conditions in the remand center, citing issues like overcrowding, inadequate living conditions, and lack of proper meals. The argument also referenced a recent case involving Justin Ho to support their position.
However, in his ruling, Magistrate Ratakele criticized the defense for not providing legal precedents that would support the claim that simply obtaining new counsel constituted a valid change in circumstances. He also indicated that the remand conditions, while regrettable, did not justify bail in serious cases, particularly given the substantial drug charges. He advised that if Lewaivanua believes his rights are being infringed, he should raise this matter in the High Court.
As the case progresses, it is important to notice that the bail application for Lewaivanua’s co-accused, Mr. Lubi, is scheduled to be heard on November 5, which will continue to shed light on the judiciary’s approach in dealing with serious drug-related offenses among law enforcement officials.
This case reflects a broader commitment within Fiji’s legal system to upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability, even among those in positions of authority. The judiciary’s strict stance on such serious offenses aims to bolster public trust in law enforcement, underscoring that no individual is above the law.