In a recent development in Fiji’s legal proceedings, the Suva High Court has been presented with significant allegations against Mohammed Saneem, the former Supervisor of Elections, and Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, the former Attorney General. These allegations were brought forward by Mesake Dawai, the Manager Legal at the Fijian Elections Office, who testified about concerns regarding Saneem’s favoritism towards the FijiFirst Party and alleged bullying towards him during Saneem’s time in office.
Dawai highlighted concerns about Saneem’s back pay, revealing potential irregularities in the contract and related transaction receipts that suggest falsification. Such issues have raised concerns over potential criminal activities, as Saneem held a significant authoritative position. Dawai also noted the unusual nature of a Supervisor of Elections receiving a pay rise in an election year, prompting him to draft and send a complaint letter to the police.
The legal ramifications extend to Sayed-Khaiyum, who faces an abuse of office charge, while Saneem is charged with obtaining a corrupt benefit. These allegations revolve around the approval of payments that covered Saneem’s taxes without the necessary authorization, which allegedly were orchestrated during Sayed-Khaiyum’s tenure as Acting Prime Minister. Specifically, a Deed of Variation and Addendum between the Government and Saneem was reportedly signed without the proper approvals from the Constitutional Offices Commission and the President.
This case has already seen testimony from other key figures, including Financial Controller Romika Sewak, who revealed Saneem’s concerns over tax deductions and unusual requests regarding his back pay processing. Sewak’s testimony pointed to broader irregularities in pay adjustments tied to Saneem’s role during the covered tax period.
The trial has thrown a spotlight on procedural transparency and accountability in Fiji’s government operations. With the judiciary examining these allegations, it underscores the crucial role of legal systems in upholding ethical governance. As the trial continues, it carries significant implications for public confidence and the integrity of electoral processes in Fiji, reinforcing the importance of transparency and legal adherence in public office procedures.