A civil society organization has strongly opposed the potential reintroduction of corporal punishment in Fiji, deeming it an outrageous violation of child rights. Nilesh Lal, the executive director of Dialogue Fiji, voiced concerns that such proposals fail to meet both legal and moral responsibilities to shield children from all forms of violence.
At a recent human rights workshop held in Labasa, Lal criticized the rationale behind reinstating corporal punishment, calling it misguided and dangerous. He remarked, “We have moved away from torture and physical punishment,” expressing disbelief that anyone in the 21st century would contemplate a return to these outdated practices.
Lal emphasized the duty of the state to respect and uphold children’s rights, highlighting ongoing debates about disciplinary measures in the wake of a justice system that no longer employs corporal punishment as a consequence. The push for physical punishment reflects a broader societal lapse in seeking constructive alternatives for addressing children’s behavioral challenges.
Current statistics reveal troubling trends, with five out of every six children in Fiji experiencing some form of abuse or neglect. Additionally, there were 324 reported cases of child sexual abuse in just the first half of the year. These alarming figures underline the urgent need to enhance child safety and showcase the inherent dangers of reintroducing corporal punishment, whether in educational settings or at home.
Pravesh Sharma, chairperson of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission, concurred with Lal, asserting that such measures would contravene constitutional rights and international agreements, especially those stipulated by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The debate surrounding corporal punishment marks a pivotal moment for Fiji to reconsider its methods of child discipline and education. Advocating for non-violent approaches could foster safer and more compassionate educational experiences, ultimately supporting children’s academic success and emotional development.
Amid the challenges faced, the discussions sparked by this controversy offer a hopeful perspective for meaningful change. There is potential for a future where children’s rights are prioritized and non-violent disciplinary practices become standard in schools, reflecting a growing commitment across the community to nurture and protect children’s well-being.