Ro Naulu Mataitini, the chief of REWA, has expressed his strong disapproval regarding the recent uproar over electricity tariffs in Fiji, labeling the situation as a clear example of political hypocrisy. In response to criticisms from former attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum and Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu concerning a proposed 25 percent increase in electricity rates, he contended that those who are most vocally opposing the price rise are, in fact, the very individuals responsible for the flawed system that has precipitated the ongoing crisis.
In a pointed statement on social media, Ro Naulu underscored the irony of Sayed-Khaiyum’s recent appeal for the independence of the Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission (FCCC), given his previous role in a government that curtailed institutional autonomy. He criticized the former attorney-general for prioritizing political strategy over genuine commitment to regulatory independence, suggesting that this newfound advocacy is primarily aimed at undermining the current administration rather than serving the public interest.
Central to the debate over the tariff hikes is a significant financial challenge faced by Electricity Fiji Limited (EFL), which requires necessary revenue to provide returns to its shareholders. Ro Naulu emphasized that while the Opposition’s criticisms of the tariff increases are loud, they conveniently ignore the ramifications stemming from the 2021 sale of a 44 percent stake in EFL to the Japanese company Chugoku, a deal that introduced profit expectations complicating public affordability.
He also aligned with Seruiratu’s description of a recent 21-day pause in consultations as ‘political theatre,’ suggesting it was orchestrated by the Opposition and further illuminating their disconnect from the structural issues they had a hand in creating.
This exchange opens the door for deeper discussions regarding the sustainability of public utilities in an increasingly privatized economy and emphasizes the necessity for accountability among all political actors involved. The current circumstances could prompt more vigorous debates about governance, financial frameworks for public services, and the imperative for transparency in the management of essential services. Ultimately, it sheds light on the critical issue of reconciling public interests with the realities of corporate profit motives in the energy sector.