The Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Thomas Pryde, has filed an application in the High Court in Suva, requesting judicial review of decisions by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) and the President of Fiji that led to the suspension of his salary, allowances, and benefits. The application, submitted on October 20, challenges what Pryde deems unconstitutional and unlawful actions taken against him.
Pryde’s grievance is rooted in a July 25, 2025, decision which he argues lacked proper legal justification. This decision followed complaints referencing alleged breaches of his service agreement, claims he vehemently disputes. The JSC’s recommendation to suspend his benefits, according to Pryde, undermines many constitutional provisions, including the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair hearing.
In his court application, Pryde emphasizes that he was not given the opportunity to respond to the allegations prior to the drastic suspension of his salary. He contests that under Section 117(5) of the Fijian Constitution, his remuneration cannot be altered disadvantageously unless part of a broader austerity policy, which he asserts does not apply to his situation.
Notably, Pryde has previously indicated his willingness to engage in his official duties, contingent upon the JSC adhering to its constitutional obligations and resolving the complaints against him appropriately. His earlier communications highlighted procedural failures by the JSC, particularly in delegating its responsibilities to external agencies, which is allegedly unconstitutional and disruptive to due process.
Pryde’s legal pursuit through AK Lawyers seeks various remedies, including the quashing of the JSC’s recommendations and the President’s decision, reinstatement of his salary, and compensation for distress and damage to reputation. This case brings to the fore significant questions of governance and the separation of powers within Fiji’s judicial framework, potentially setting a precedent for future administrative conduct involving senior legal officers.
The court is expected to assign a date soon where the claims will be further examined. There is a glimmer of optimism that the ongoing legal proceedings may lead to necessary reforms that enhance transparency and accountability in Fiji’s judicial process, reinforcing the principles of fairness and due process for individuals facing disciplinary reviews.