Concerns have been raised by the prosecution regarding comments made by Suva lawyer Tanya Waqanika, who is facing criminal charges in the Suva Magistrate’s Court. Senior prosecutor Joseph Work addressed these matters before Justice Siainiu Fa’alogo Bull, emphasizing the importance of documenting them formally within the court records.
Justice Bull is currently presiding over Waqanika’s motion for a permanent stay in her lower court proceedings, where she is charged under the Political Parties Act for publicly opposing a political party. The implications of this charge are significant, as they touch on the intersection between legal and political frameworks in Fiji.
During the court session, defense attorney Barbara Malimali pointed out a crucial element of their application, challenging the legitimacy of Acting FICAC Commissioner Lavi Rokoika’s appointment. Court documents indicate that Waqanika is pursuing a declaration that Rokoika’s appointment is illegal, null, and void, raising questions about the governance and oversight of political party activities.
The case is poised for another hearing on March 20, where critical legal interpretations concerning FICAC appointments and the Political Parties Act will be examined. As this legal battle unfolds, it is likely to shed light on the law’s role in Fiji’s political landscape, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established democratic processes. The case serves as a key example of the intricate dynamics at play between law and politics in the nation.