The Suva High Court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama against the Fijian government regarding unpaid pension and gratuity entitlements. Bainimarama sought over $337,000 in unpaid gratuity and a bi-weekly pension exceeding $7,000, arguing that these payments were miscalculated due to a temporarily reduced salary rather than his full statutory entitlement. However, Justice Daniel Goundar ruled that the salary and allowances prescribed under the Parliamentary Remuneration Act 2014 remain valid until a new determination is made by Parliament.
This dismissal comes amidst ongoing legal actions initiated by Bainimarama, who served as Prime Minister from 2009 to 2022. In earlier proceedings, Bainimarama contended that the government reduced his pension and gratuity payments contrary to the Prime Ministers Pension Act of 1994. The court proceedings have highlighted significant discussions on the correct calculation and disbursement of retirement benefits for public officials.
While Bainimarama’s claim was dismissed, the case underscores the complexities surrounding government pensions and entitlements, especially where legislative interpretations and calculations are concerned. Such legal battles emphasize the need for legislative clarity and transparency in pension entitlements, possibly prompting further review or reform of the governing frameworks to prevent future disputes.
Overall, this legal episode reinforces the critical nature of precise and fair administrative processes in public service remuneration. As Fiji continues to grapple with the intricacies of pension laws, this case could catalyze necessary discussions and adjustments to ensure equitable treatment of former high-ranking officials.