Concerns have been raised by the Social Empowerment and Education Programme (SEEP) and Human Rights Commissioner Chantelle Khan regarding recent comments made by a police officer and pastor who referred to Hindu and Muslim festivals as “demonic activities.” Such remarks have sparked significant backlash, prompting calls for unity and respect among Fiji’s diverse religious communities.
Khan highlighted that such statements are contrary to the values of peace and cohesion, which are essential to Fijian society. She stressed that everyone is subject to the law and that human rights and equality must be upheld. While Fiji’s Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and prohibits discrimination, Khan affirmed that hate speech against any religious group undermines the dignity and safety of individuals within the nation.
In a related response, the Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission (FHRADC) reiterated the importance of exercising freedom of religion responsibly, denouncing inflammatory comments made by religious figures that threaten social unity. They emphasized that hate speech from public figures contravenes the principles of respect and harmony that are vital for coexistence in Fiji’s multicultural society.
This incident echoes critiques from various community leaders, including Opposition Member of Parliament Vijay Nath, who characterized the comments as “unethical and disgraceful.” He called for community solidarity against intolerance and a reaffirmation of Fiji’s rich cultural tapestry where pluralism has flourished for generations.
The Shree Sanatan Dharm Pratinidhi Sabha has also publicly condemned the derogatory comments, demanding an investigation into the police officer’s remarks. Community leaders, including those from the Fiji Muslim League and Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, have united in their denouncement of hate speech, promoting mutual respect as vital for sustaining social cohesion.
The ongoing challenge of fostering interfaith dialogue is underscored by a broader context of rising religious intolerance in Fiji, marked by several disturbing incidents targeting places of worship in recent months. However, community leaders express hope that these challenges might lead to constructive conversations and initiatives aimed at reinforcing Fiji’s commitment to peace and mutual respect among different faiths.
As Fiji grapples with these incidents, the collective resolve shown by various community organizations signals a hopeful direction towards stronger interfaith relations and a more inclusive society, ensuring that all individuals can practice their respective beliefs freely and safely.
