The New Republic has reported that records concerning accusations from a woman who credibly claimed that Donald Trump engaged in sexual misconduct with her when she was a minor have seemingly been removed from public documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. This comes amidst a broader discourse about transparency and accountability regarding Epstein’s alleged activities.
Edith Olmsted of TNR highlighted that a 21-page slideshow within a massive collection of Epstein-related documents contained details about incidents occurring between 1983 and 1985. The woman alleged that Trump forced her to perform oral sex as a minor; when she resisted by biting him, he reportedly responded with violence, kicking her out afterward. According to her testimony, she was introduced to Trump by Epstein in 1984.
Furthermore, records obtained by independent journalists Roger Sollenberger and Nina Burleigh show that the FBI interviewed this woman multiple times, at least four occasions, suggesting the importance of her allegations. However, these records have been hidden from public view, which raises significant concerns given the Epstein Files Transparency Act that mandates such documents to be accessible.
Notably, the first recorded FBI interview took place on August 9, 2019, just a day before Epstein’s death in jail, further highlighting the gravity and urgency surrounding these allegations. Attorney General Pam Bondi has testified before the House Judiciary Committee asserting that there was “no evidence” against Trump regarding these claims, a position that is part of a larger narrative of denial from Trump and his officials.
In a separate but related development, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, a member of the British royal family, was arrested on charges linked to Epstein, marking a significant moment as this is the first royal arrest in 350 years. Trump described Andrew’s situation as “a shame” and “a very sad thing,” further intertwining the ongoing web of allegations and political ramifications stemming from Epstein’s associations.
This situation underscores the complexities and challenges faced in seeking justice and accountability in high-profile cases involving powerful individuals. The removal of these records from public eye not only stokes public interest but also prompts crucial discussions about the transparency and mechanisms of justice in cases involving sexual misconduct and trafficking.