The International Criminal Court (ICC) is currently deliberating on a request for interim release submitted by former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, amid rising concerns from families of his drug war victims. Kristina Conti, a counsel for the victims at the ICC, emphasized that the perspectives of these victims should be considered equally important as those of the prosecution and defense during this process.
Duterte’s legal team has formally requested the ICC’s approval for his provisional release, asserting that prosecutors have shown no opposition to the request. They have also indicated that an unnamed government is prepared to host Duterte if granted permission to leave custody, yet Conti urges that these assertions require verification by the Pre-Trial Chamber. She pointed out that without confirmation from involved parties, such claims could be seen as self-serving.
The potential for Duterte’s interim release has ignited fear among the families of victims of his contentious drug campaign, as expressed by the group Rise Up for Life and Rights. They articulated their distress at the thought of Duterte, whom they hold accountable for their losses, potentially gaining freedom. The group highlighted the irony in Duterte’s potential access to due process while many individuals caught in his drug war were deprived of this fundamental right.
Conti reiterated the necessity of allowing victims’ voices in the deliberations concerning Duterte’s release. She noted that even if granted interim release, it would not equate to complete freedom, as he would remain under stringent restrictions.
While Duterte’s defense cites health concerns and age as compelling reasons for his humanitarian release, Conti and the victims maintain that the ICC’s detention facilities can adequately meet his medical needs. Historical precedent suggests that interim releases are not commonly granted for severe charges, such as crimes against humanity, as seen in past ICC cases.
Duterte’s confirmation of charges hearing is set for September 23, where the prosecution and defense will present their evidence and witness testimonies, leading to a decision on whether the case should progress to trial.
This case emphasizes the complex intersection of justice, human rights, and the ongoing aftermath of the drug war in the Philippines. It is essential for the views of victims to be central in these discussions, advocating for justice and recognition of their suffering within legal frameworks.