Guillermo del Toro’s film adaptation of Mary Shelley’s classic novel “Frankenstein,” now streaming on Netflix, brings a fresh perspective to a story that has been reimagined countless times. With Oscar Isaac portraying the iconic Victor Frankenstein and Jacob Elordi taking on the role of the Creature, del Toro aims to capture the essence and heart of Shelley’s narrative rather than providing a strict retelling.
Del Toro has expressed that his interpretation may not adhere closely to the original text but emphasizes core themes about the human spirit. He explained, “The usual discourse of Frankenstein has to do with science gone awry, but for me, it’s about forgiveness, understanding and the importance of listening to each other.” This philosophical bent highlights a departure from merely focusing on the consequences of unchecked ambition that many adaptations have centered upon.
Julie Carlson, an English professor and expert on the romantic period, shared her thoughts on the film. She commended del Toro for his clear affection for Shelley’s work, noting that it respects the structure of the original narrative while allowing characters like Victor and the Creature to articulate their own stories. This is a notable shift from previous adaptations, which have often minimized the characters’ complexities.
One significant alteration is the development of Victor’s backstory, depicting his father as abusive, which shifts the story’s themes from mere hubris to issues of shame and familial expectations. This backstory adds layers to Victor’s motivations and the film’s overarching narrative concerning parental relationships and their ramifications on individual choices.
The character of Elizabeth has also been rejuvenated in this adaptation. Rather than being a passive figure betrothed to Victor, she is portrayed as an independent scientist with her own passions, such as entomology. This transformation reflects a modern understanding of gender roles, steering away from the traditional portrayals of female characters in the original narrative.
The film also explores Elizabeth’s relationship with the Creature, introducing interactions that evoke sympathy and connection rather than the vilified fear often associated with Frankenstein’s monster. Del Toro navigates this relationship delicately, emphasizing mutual understanding over romantic or erotic implications, which provides a fresh take on the source material’s themes of alienation and acceptance.
While the film’s focus shifts some of the social critiques present in Shelley’s work, it maintains elements of humanization for the Creature, allowing for deeper emotional connections. This portrayal challenges the immediate fear that often accompanies the character, opting for a narrative that encourages empathy and understanding.
Del Toro’s adaptation has garnered attention for its layered storytelling, positioning it closer to the complexities of Shelley’s original work than many past interpretations. It stands out as not just a horror film but as a gothic exploration of moral questions and the depths of human experience. Overall, del Toro honors Mary Shelley’s legacy, contributing thoughtfully to the ongoing dialogue surrounding her influential narrative.