In Chicago, the city is currently facing a growing concern over the deployment of delivery robots that have flooded the sidewalks, causing frustration among residents. This influx is part of a pilot program launched by companies Coco and Serve, which introduced robots designed to deliver goods around the city. However, the presence of these machines has sparked significant backlash, leading to calls for a halt in their operations.
Recent reports indicate that over 700 residents from 35 different zip codes have come together to sign a petition dubbed “Sidewalks are for People.” The aim of this campaign is to urge city officials to pause the pilot program until comprehensive safety and accessibility data is released, as well as evaluations of the robots’ impact on local employment. Organizer Josh Robertson raised crucial questions regarding the safety of sidewalks with these robots, emphasizing that residents deserve clarity on their potential dangers or benefits.
The concern for pedestrian safety has been underscored by incidents involving the robots. One such incident involved a Coco-bot that left resident Anthony Jonas needing medical attention after colliding with it and suffering injuries from its visibility flag. This has fueled further animosity toward the robots, with some residents expressing a desire to take matters into their own hands. Comments on local forums have revealed extreme frustration, including suggestions of vandalism and other disruptions aimed at the robots.
As city officials, including several Aldermen, engage the community to gather opinions about the pilot program, the decision to continue or halt the rollout hangs in the balance. Locals are also voicing concerns about the robots’ ability to navigate during the winter months, particularly with Chicago’s notorious icy and snowy conditions complicating their function. The pilot is anticipated to last until at least May 2026, and as the situation evolves, residents remain active in conveying their discontent.
This ongoing dialogue around the robots not only reflects concerns for community safety but also highlights the broader implications of technology in urban environments. As discussions continue, there remains hope that a compromise can be reached to benefit both residents and the innovation these delivery systems bring.