A New York judge has dismissed the top manslaughter charge against Daniel Penny in connection with the death of Jordan Neely, a homeless man, during a subway incident last year. This decision comes after the jury indicated twice that they could not reach a unanimous verdict on the manslaughter charge.
Judge Maxwell Wiley informed the jury to continue deliberating on the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide. He expressed uncertainty about whether this would influence the jury’s decision. The defense attorney, Thomas Kenniff, opposed this move, raising concerns that it could lead to a coerced verdict and reiterated his call for a mistrial.
The jury, which has been deliberating since Tuesday, previously informed the judge of their inability to agree on a verdict related to manslaughter. The case centers around an incident where Penny, a former U.S. Marine, placed Neely in a chokehold for approximately six minutes on the subway after Neely shouted for money.
Prosecutors argue that Penny’s reaction was excessive, while the defense maintains that he was acting in self-defense and in protection of fellow passengers. The lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide could result in a range of punishments, from probation to four years in prison.
Judge Wiley had praised the jurors for their conscientious efforts during deliberation, a reminder that reaching a consensus in such emotionally charged cases can be challenging.
This situation highlights the complexities surrounding issues of mental health, public safety, and legal accountability, illustrating the ongoing societal discussion about how to best address similar incidents in the future.
While the legal proceedings continue, it is hopeful that this case will lead to broader conversations about the treatment of mental illness in public spaces and how communities can support vulnerable populations.
Summary: A judge has dismissed the manslaughter charge against Daniel Penny in the case of Jordan Neely’s death, encouraging the jury to deliberate on the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide. The case has raised discussions on mental health and public safety, reflecting a need for societal support for vulnerable individuals.