Centreville High Investigation: Preliminary Findings Raise Questions About Allegations

Centreville High Investigation: Preliminary Findings Raise Questions About Allegations

by

in

Allegations that a social worker at Centreville High School coerced students into obtaining abortions without notifying their guardians have been deemed unfounded by attorneys representing Fairfax County Public Schools. Preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation, conducted by the law firm King & Spalding, suggest that not only may the teacher who raised the allegations have fabricated evidence, but that relevant state officials may have been informed of these claims prior to their public disclosure.

Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) Superintendent Michelle Reid addressed families and staff at Centreville High, stating that the findings provide a clearer picture of the situation and emphasize the importance of protecting staff from unfounded accusations. In her message, Reid referenced that the allegations from 2021 are likely to be untrue based on the initial investigation’s results.

The controversy began when Zenaida Perez, a teacher at the high school, alleged that a social worker facilitated an abortion for two underage students using school funds, without involving their parents. Following these claims, FCPS initiated an external investigation, and Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin ordered the State Police to conduct a criminal probe.

King & Spalding’s investigation revealed emails that indicated the social worker followed appropriate protocols by referring the students to a school nurse, who is approved to discuss pregnancy options. Furthermore, investigators have had difficulty contacting one of the former students alleged to have undergone an abortion; initial statements indicating the social worker’s involvement may have been drafted by Perez herself.

The inquiry also highlighted a lack of pressure on the students, with one who did not proceed with an abortion clarifying that she only spoke with the school nurse and was never pressured regarding her options. King & Spalding’s analysis suggests that Perez’s allegations may have originated as retaliation against school administrators involved in a separate case from 2022, where she was cited for unprofessional conduct concerning offering a pregnancy test to a student.

Additionally, there are implications that Perez has been aligned with conservative political circles, raising questions about her motivations for bringing forth the allegations. The investigation unearthed communications attesting that these alleged practices were already reviewed by school administrators, who found no basis for any claims.

An attorney representing Perez has fiercely rebuked the insinuation that she may have fabricated evidence, labeling the FCPS findings as a “whitewash” and cautioning against prematurely drawing conclusions from the investigation.

As the investigation continues, the evolving details remind us of the complexities surrounding sensitive issues like these in educational settings, underscoring the need for thorough verification and accountability. Despite the tumultuous nature of these allegations, there is hope that the ongoing investigation will clarify the truth and reaffirm the integrity of the school system.

Popular Categories


Search the website